H2 pion fractions EJB March 23, 2000 For the sake of completeness, I took a quick look again at the pion fractions in the tail of the CTIME spectra for the H2 pulsecounting data (I don't recall whether anyone did this), so that we'd have some more up-to-date numbers to compare to Richard's result for the D2 data. I used the Sep 98 pulse counting data, and performed a fit like Richard's P(t) = A + B*exp(-(t-34)/2.2) to the tail after the main portion of the CTIME spectrum. I did this for the 5 coincidence runs that were available. I also fit the region before the beam window just to see if it's the same as the constant term after the beam window. I define the pion fraction to be the fitted value of B divided by the mean # counts per bin in the beam window region. The results of the fit are below: for anyone who wants to look at pictures they can be found at www2.physics.umd.edu/~beise/sample/ctime/ run # tube # pi frac bkgnd after bkgnd before (%) (%) (%) -------------------------------------------------------------- 5002 3 3.12 +- 0.28 0.12+-0.03 0.13+-0.45 5028 3 5.6 +- 1.3 1.13+-0.26 1.63+-3.50 5006 5 2.28 +- 0.18 0.24+-0.03 0.12+-0.49 5010 7 4.73 +- 0.89 1.84+-0.20 4.08+-4.80 5004 8 4.18 +- 0.32 0.12+-0.03 0.22+-0.58 5008 9 3.00 +- 0.19 0.17+-0.02 0.25+-0.67 With the exception of tube 7, the backgrounds before and after are pretty consistent. The values are all in pretty good agreement, and consistently higher than the estimate by Bryon (more consistent with the old Monte Carlo result). His fit was 2.4+-0.4%. It's interesting to note the increase with decreasing scattering angle. mir# theta pifrac ----------------------- 5 161 2.3 9 154 3.0 3,8 146 (3.1,4.2) 7 138 4.7 Betsy ------------------------------------------------------------------ Elizabeth J. Beise phone: (301)-405-6109 Dept. of Physics FAX: (301)-405-8558 Univ. of Maryland beise@physics.umd.edu College Park, MD 20742-4111 ------------------------------------------------------------------