Phys 624 - Quantum Field Theory
University of Maryland, College Park
Fall 2016, Professor: Ted Jacobson
Homework
HW0
- due at beginning of
class Thursday, Sept. 08.
HW12
-
due
at beginning
of class
Thursday, Dec.
15
1.
S16.4
(Landau
pole with
standard model
fermions)
(Note: To keep
this simple,
define the
renormalized
charges at
mtop2,
and run
up the energy
scale starting
from mtop,
using the |p2|
>> mtop2
approximation
in the vacuum
polarization
graphs. The
fine structure
constant at mtop
is eR2(mtop)/4π
~ 1/127.
2. Axion
lifetime:
An axion is a
hypothetical
pseudoscalar
particle that
might couple
to the
electromagnetic
field via the
interaction in
Eqn. (4) of this
particle data
group article.
(a) Use
dimensional
analysis and
physical
reasoning to
argue that the
rate for the
axion to decay
to two photons
is given by
Eqn. (6) in
the same
article, up to
a numerical
factor. (b)
Derive the
numerical
factor.
3.
Linear
sigma model
4.
gauge
invariance and the little group for massless
spin-1 particles
HW11
- due
at beginning of
class Tuesday,
Nov. 22
1. Chiral
symmetry:
In class we
showed that
conservation
of the Dirac
current
(10.110)
follows from
the invariance
of the action
under constant
phase changes
of the spinor
field, when
the spinor
field
satisfies its
equation of
motion. This
is an example
of Noether's
theorem, which
is discussed
in section
3.3. I
explained it a
bit
differently,
as follows:
Under a a
phase shift of
the spinor
field,
(10.99), with
a non
constant
phase, the
variation of
the action is
not generally
zero, but
comes only
from the term
involving the
derivative
of the phase
contracted
with some
current
vector. However,
if the fields
are varied
away from a
solution to
the equation
of motion,
then the variation
of the action
must vanish
for any
variation,
including this
one. Integrating
by parts, this
implies that
the current is
conserved.
Show that:
(a) the
Dirac action
is invariant
under the
axial phase
transformation
with constant
alpha, if and
only if the
mass vanishes;
(b) this
symmetry in
the massless
case implies
conservation
of the axial
vector
current, (by
an argument analogous
analogous
to the one I
gave above);
(c)
conservation
of the vector
and axial
vector
currents
implies that
the L and R
currents are
separately
conserved;
(d) when the
mass is zero,
the action is
invariant
under separate
constant phase
transformations
of the L and R
spinors, and
show directly
from this that
the L and
currents are
separately
conserved.
2. Read
Chapter 17 (The
anomalous
magnetic
moment)
3. Exotic contributions to g-2(For part (a),
you may evaluate the final
integral to lowest order in me/mh.
For part (c), you may assume the
axion mass is much smaller than
the electron mass, as that is
anyway implied by other bounds.)
HW10
- due
at beginning of
class Thursday,
Nov. 10
1. S
13.6
(a,b,c only) (parity
violation)
2. Bhabha
scattering
HW9
- due
at beginning of
class Thursday,
Nov. 3
1. S
13.3
(particle
decays to
e+e−) [Note: To compute the total decay rate, you
should sum
over the spins
of the final
particles and,
for the cases
of vector and
axial vector
decaying
particle,
average over
the initial
polarizations.
What will
enter is
spherically
symmetrical
after the spin
and
polarization
sums, which
makes the
phase space
integration
straightforward.
To check
yourself, the
result,
according to
my sources, is
(but I didn't
check it
myself, so I
can't swear
it's correct).
The factor
[1/3] applies
in the vector
and axial
vector cases.
For the form
of M, compare
with what you
see in
(13.22).]
2. (spontaneous
symmetry
breaking and
Higgs
mechanism)
(i) Read http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Englert-Brout-Higgs-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble_mechanism.
(ii) verify
equations (9)
and (12), and
(iii) post any
questions you
have about
this at
Piazza.
HW8
- due
at beginning of
class Thursday,
Oct. 27
1.
(boost to
the
eigenspinors)
In class
we will show
directly that
the spinors
u(p) and v(p)
in (11.25)
satisfy the
Dirac equation
with positive
and negative
energy,
respectively.
These
solutions can
also be
obtained from
(11.17) by
application of
a Lorentz
boost. (a)
What
hyperbolic
boost angle
produces
energy E and
momentum p
starting with
zero momentum?
(b) Apply the
appropriate
boosts to the
L & R
chirality
components of
(11.17) and
show that you
recover
(11.25). [Hint:
exp[w·]=cosh(w)
+ sinh(w) (w/w)·,
where
w = √w·w,
as
noted in
class.]
2.
S11.4
(Gordon
identity) [By "on-shell spinors" he means, for example, that
p-slash u(p) =
m u(p). Hint:
Use this
property to
introduce
p-slash and
q-slash, and
then fiddle
with the gamma
matrices.] [The first and second printings have an error in this
problem. If
you have one
of those
printings,
ignore the
last sentence
,which starts
after the
words "dipole
moment".]
3.
(Fermi
oscillator) Suppose
b and b*
satisfy the
algebraic
relations
{b,b}=0={b*,b*},
and {b,b*}=1,
where b* is
the Hermitian
conjugate of b
and { , }
represents the
anticommutator.
Show that the
spectrum of
b*b consists
of just two
values, 0 and
1,
corresponding
to eigenstates
|0> and
|1>, and
that
b|0>=0,
b*|0>=|1>,
b|1>=|0>.
HW7 - due at beginning of class Thursday, Oct.
20.
1.
Nonrelativistic
limit of Dirac
equation
2. S10.1(h) (Dimensional/physical
analysis)
Do
ONLY part (h)
of this
problem, and
find the
Rydberg
instead of the
inverse
Rydberg. You
might remember
some or all of
the
expressions;
and you could
of course use
full blown
dimensional
analysis,
after
identifying on
physical
grounds which
one of the
four
quantities e,
m, c,
should not
appear, but
the point of
this exercise
is to practice
a simplified
method: in
units with
,
write each
quantity as
the
appropriate
power of the
the electron
mass times the
appropriate
power of the
fine structure
constant, and
determine the
latter just by
using physics
to infer what
power of the
electric
charge should
appear in the
quantity. [If you are looking at the 4th printing or earlier, note
that "m"
should be
/
in that part,
and
"time-dependent"
should be
time-independent".]
3. S11.1
(Dirac matrix identities)
4. S11.9
(right handed neutrino, Majorana mass &
see-saw mechanism) The 4th
and 5th printings differ on this problem. If you
already did the problem using the 4th printing
version, just indicate that on your hw. Otherwise,
please use the 5th printing
version, linked here. [4th printing
version: Change part (d) to: "If m=100GeV, what value of
M would yield a light neutrino mass 0.1 eV, and what
would be the heavy neutrino mass? For
11.9(c), by "satisfies the
Klein-Gordon equation" he
means with a mass-matrix
that can be diagonalized.
By taking linear
combinations of the fields
you can decouple the
system into components,
each of which satisfies
the Klein-Gordon equation
with a different mass.] Hint
: To show that
it satisfies
the KG eqn you
should use the
nice
identity
(if you can't
read this
math, try
another
browser -
Safari and
Firefox work
for me).]
HW6 - due at beginning of class Thursday, Oct.
13.
1. S3.6 (Yukawa potential) Skip
part (f). See Sec. 3.4 (Coulomb's law) for comparison.
2.
(a) Verify that the
massive spin-1 field
operator, Eqn (8.64),
satisfies the field
equation coming from the
Proca
Lagrangian
(8.23).
(b) Evaluate
the vacuum correlation function
.
This will involve doing the sum over the three
polarizations. Express the result in a Lorentz
covariant way, in terms of η_μν,
p_μ
(with p_0 = √p2+m2),
and the mass m.
Leave
the result as an integral over the momentum.
3. (Energy positivity for the Proca and Maxwell
vector fields) Find the Hamiltonian density
for the Proca Lagrangian (8.23), and show that the
energy density is positive, apart from a total
divergence term. To do this: (i) Find the momentum
π^i conjugate to A_i, and the momentum π^0
conjugate to A_0. The latter should vanish
identically. (ii) Express the Hamiltonian density in
terms of A_i, π^i, and A_0. (For the spatial
derivatives term involving A_i use the shorter
notation F_ij F_ij.) (iii) Find the equation of
motion for A_0, solve it, and substitute back into
the Hamiltonian density to eliminate A_0. At this
point, the result should be positive, except for a
total divergence. (iv) Now consider the massless
case. Show that A_0 now acts just as a Lagrange
multiplier, and find the constraint that its
equation of motion imposes. This is the Gauss law
constraint of electromagnetism. (v) Show that if you
substitute this Gauss law constraint back into the
Hamiltonian density, again the Hamiltonian density
is positive, up to a total divergence.
HW5 - due at beginning of class Thursday, Oct.
06.
1. S5.3 (muon decay phase space)
Before doing this problem read section S5.1.1.
For
part (a), it is probably wise to use Lorentz invariance to
simplify the integral over the phase space
by working in the CM frame for two of the final particles. For part (b) the stated value for the muon
mass is not the most accurate. Go to the Particle Data Group
website, http://pdg.lbl.gov/,
to look up the current best value. (And, by the way, note that
the electron neutrino that emerges from the muon decay is an
antineutrino.)
2. Problem S7.8
(mu and tau decay) Assume the W
couples universally, i.e.
couples to electron, muon, and
tauon with the same coupling
constant g. This is how it works
in the Standard Model. For
part (a), also draw the relevant Feynman diagram.
For part (d), set g = 0.3, which corresponds to g2/4π
= e2/4π
= 1/137. In part (e), Explain why the prediction
of the tauon mass depends only on the muon mass
and the muon and tauon lifetimes. Also, note that
in (e) and (f), the subscript on one of the
neutrinos should be tau, not mu.
3. Problem S7.9
(unstable
particles and widths) Before doing
this problem, read sections S7.4.1
and S24.1.0,2,4.
For part (a), assume scalar particles.
Correct the statement in (d) to read "Loops
of psi will have imaginary parts if and only
if √p2 is greater than twice the
mass of psi.."
HW4
- due at beginning of class Thursday, Sept.
29.
The linked file consists of three problems:
1. Proof of Wick's theorem.
2. Feynman rules for
theory, and practice with symmetry factors.
3. Mass as an interaction.
HW3
- due at beginning of class Thursday, Sept.
22.
HW2 - due at beginning of class Thursday, Sept.
15.
1. The LHC is currently producing head-on collisions of
protons with energy 6.5 TeV each. If instead one of the
protons were at rest, what energy would the other proton need
to have in order to produce a collision with the same energy
in the zero-momentum frame? (Tip: Express the energy in
the ZM frame as a Lorentz invariant scalar constructed from
the two 4-momenta, and use this to solve for the energy.)
2. For a given source distance, there is an effective maximum
energy above which the universe is opaque to extragalactic
gamma rays due to the pair creation process
,
where the second photon comes from the "background light". To
get a sense for where this cutoff energy lies, compute the
threshold energy for a gamma ray to collide with a 1 micron
photon to make an electron-positron pair. Compare your result
with the graph in Fig. 3 of http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.2822.
3. Read Section 1.9 of Weigand, on the complex scalar field.
(a) Find the conjugate momenta and then the Hamiltonian and
mode expansions in terms of raising and lowering operators,
using the real and imaginary parts of the field. (b) Next
verify (1.121-125). (I don't approve of the words written
around (1.120), which assert that the field and it's hermitian
conjugate are independent fields. They are not.) (c)
Show that the current (1.129) is divergenceless (),
and show that this implies that the charge Q is conserved. (d)
Verify (1.130-131).
HW1
- due at beginning of class Thursday, Sept.
08.