UMD PERG PhD Dissertations: |
This dissertation begins to fill this gap by examining physics graduate students who teach discussion sections for introductory courses using tutorials, which are guided worksheets completed by groups of students. While assisting students with their conceptual understanding of physics, TAs are also expected to convey classroom norms of constructing arguments and listening and responding to the reasoning of others. Physics graduate students enter into the role of tutorial TA having relative content expertise but minimal or no pedagogical expertise.
This analysis contends that considering the broader influences on TAs can
account for TA behavior. Observations from two institutions (University of Colorado,
Boulder and University of Maryland, College Park) show that TAs have different
valuations (or buy-in) of the tutorials they teach, which have specific, identifiable
consequences in the classroom. These differences can be explained by differences in the
TAs’ different teaching environments. Next, I examine cases of a behavior shared by
three TAs, in which they focus on relatively superficial indicators of knowledge. Because
the beliefs that underlie their teaching decisions vary, I argue that understanding and
addressing the TAs individual beliefs will lead to more effective professional
development. Lastly, this analysis advocates a new perspective on TA professional
development: one in which TAs' ideas about teaching are taken to be interesting,
plausible, and potentially productive.
Chapter 1 | Introduction |
Chapter 2 | Past and future TA research: previous research on TAs and the teacher research that should guide future studies |
Chapter 3 | A theoretical framework for explaining interactions and cognition |
Chapter 4 | Accounting for tutorial TAs’ buy-in to reform instruction |
Chapter 5 | Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning |
Chapter 6 |
A new perspective: Respecting TAs’ beliefs and experiences |
Chapter 7 |
Summary and future directions |
Appendices |
Characterization of TA buy-in and interview questions |
Thesis in PDF format
Front matter and chapters 1-3
Chapter 4 (Phys.
Rev. ST-PER 5 020109 (2009))
Chapter 5 (Phys. Rev. ST-PER 6 010105 (2010))
Chapter 6
Chapter 7 and Appendices
Back to UMD PERG PhD Dissertations
Maintained by
University of Maryland PERG
Com8ments and questions may be directed to
E. F. Redish
Last modified 30 August 2009